Thank You for your continued support and contributions!
Just an idea...How about only including themes that work with an unpatched build, and have been tested as currently working with an SVN build. Themes that are broken, or require patches would be moved to new pages (WpsIpod5gBroken and WpsIpod5gNeedPatches perhaps). This would obviously take time, but it would also help us to keep track of which themes need fixing up, and prevent the page being clogged up with themes that are useless to (SVN) Rockbox users.pondlife
I don't see why it's bad to exclude themes that require patched builds, because they are the OFFICIAL theme gallery. Someone else can always set up hosting for the unsupported themes, that way we have more clear separation so people don't keep asking us why themes don't work.No matter how clear you make it, some people won't care to pay attention.
Why not simply encourage people to fix the remainder of the themes to be compatible with official Rockbox?
Would a separate wiki gallery for unsupported themes be a valid option? I think that it would at least keep things within the wiki, without having to find a dedicated maintainer for the hosting of unsupported themes, while at the same time provide the clearest separation without physically separating the hosting. Ultimately, this issue is up to the devs as they own the hosting, and they support the official rockbox. However, due to the volume of unsupported themes available I think they deserve a spot in the gallery rather than here and there on the web, or a 3rd party site. We already have two themes galleries but they are separated based on one that is strictly no copyright infringement vs. a more flexible stance on copyright. (ie the wiki vs. rockbox-themes.org)
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 21 queries.